I know what Donald Jeffries is talking about.
A few years ago, I was driving peacefully to work in Missoula when a certain motorcycle cop pulled me over and gave me a ticket because I (according to him) drove through a cross-walk on Broadway while there was a pedestrian in it. The fact that I was entering the cross-walk when the pedestrian stepped off the sidewalk into it from 40 feet away on the other side of the street did not make a difference to the cop. I was in violation of The Law and had to be punished for it.
Great revenue enhancement tactic, by the way. Extortion works!
I did not pay the fine. Instead, I demanded the evidence (discovery) which consisted of a video taken by the cop. After numerous viewings, I went to the city attorney and told her she did not have a good case, as the video was not conclusive enough to prove me guilty. It was the cop’s word against mine and she readily dropped the charge.
Funny thing, though. I made a comment to her about how the cop could have given me a warning instead of a ticket, but when questioned why he didn’t, claimed that he couldn’t. He had to write the ticket. He was required to write the ticket. I told the attorney that I considered the cop a liar, at which she became quite angry and literally ordered me not to “attack” her officer.
Needless to say, the conversation was over. I collected my Notice of Absolvement and went on my way.
I love this story. God works in mysterious ways, my frens. 🙏🏻
The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, describes the docuseries' portrayal of Schneider as a “hit job.” It claims Schneider had no knowledge of and was not complicit in the sexual abuse alleged in the series and that he had condemned the abuse after he learned of it.
“And, critically, [Schneider] was not a child sexual abuser himself,” the complaint says. “But for the sake of clickbait, ratings, and views—or put differently, money—Defendants have destroyed Schneider’s reputation and legacy through the false statements and implications that Schneider is exactly that.”
READ
“These claims about CIA are absolutely false and ridiculous. CIA is a resolutely apolitical institution that provides intelligence support to policymakers including the President of the United States, irrespective of who occupies the office. We are a foreign intelligence focused Agency and do not monitor the former President. The individual making these allegations is a former contractor who does not represent CIA.”
In the video which was taken last week, the CIA official waves his intelligence community green badge. Green Badges are specifically hired for those contracted by the agency. Kash Patel, former Deputy Director of National Intelligence, said "An individual possessing a contractor Green badge is only allowed to lawfully possess it while official employed as a contractor to the intelligence community. Upon any termination, credentials are returned to the home agency and destroyed immediately."
@OKeefeMediaGroup
Amjad reveals to OMG’s Undercover American Swiper that intel agencies not only kept intelligence information from a sitting United States President and Commander-In-Chief, they also used FISA to spy on Donald J. Trump and his team and are still monitoring President Trump according to Amjad who says, “We monitor everything.” Amjad adds “we also have people that monitor his ex-wife. He likes to use burner phones” – information only an insider with access to highly sensitive information would state.
“We steal it [information]” and “We hack other countries just like that,” Amjad, who states he currently works on the CIA’s China Mission Center, explains how intel agencies obtain information. He also describes a broken intelligence system where “We don’t share information across agencies” because the CIA is “very reluctant” to share information with the “careless” NSA.
O’Keefe Media Group’s bombshell undercover footage supports earlier reports by investigative journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi, and Alex Gutentag that revealed how the American intelligence community illegally ran a spy operation against then-candidate Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016 and illegally acquired intelligence that was later used to justify the Federal Bureau of Investigation official probe, “Crossfire Hurricane,” which in turn led to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that ultimately did not find evidence of Russia collusion by the 2016 Trump campaign.
Contractors like Fseisi hold the duty to withhold sharing confidential or national security information. In denying his statements, Fseisi may have realized he could be held liable for violating internal agency provisions and federal laws like the Executive Agency ethics provisions, which restrict what he may share with others outside of his contracted-to agency. Additionally, any government worker or agency head who withheld information from a superior (i.e. President Trump) may violate: (a) obstruction of justice by deception (18 USC 1512); (b) conspiracy to obstruct (18 USC 371); and false statements (18 USC 1001). Agency regulations may also provide offenses related to insubordination, reflecting poorly on the agency in public, or misrepresentation or dishonesty.
When James O’Keefe caught up with Amjad Fseisi on the streets of Washington, D.C., Fseisi could not tell O’Keefe whether he had top secret clearance, denied making statements clearly caught on camera, and would not even confirm it was him on the video saying only “It looks like me.” When asked directly if he works at the CIA, Fseisi said, “I can’t tell you that.”
@OKeefeMediaGroup